Tuesday, April 10, 2012

The Game of NHL Realignment


Not to completely steal the topic of my fellow classmate Kevin, but with the NHL playoffs fast approaching, I knew I couldn't let the subject fly by without attaching it to this course on games. As a diehard hockey fan, I have always loved watching games where the fans are really into the action. Even though I am an American through and through, I have always had a love affair with Canadian hockey teams, because their fans are far more passionate than almost any you'll find in the United States. This is perhaps why the subject of NHL realignment is so fascinating to me, as I appreciate the idea of relocating struggling franchises to places where they will have a rabid fan base.

The most recent example of this is in Winnipeg, where the former Atlanta Thrashers moved at the end of last season due to financial difficulties, poor play on the ice, and ever-declining attendance in the stands. The Thrashers became the Jets, the same name that the current-Phoenix Coyotes had before they left the city in 1996. Throughout this past regular season, Winnipeg's MTS Centre was sold out for all 41 home games, and the crowd was known to be one of the best in the league. The new setting certainly had an effect on the players, as the Jets posted one of the best home records (23-13-5) for teams who did not end up in the playoffs, compared to the 17-17-7 record the Thrashers put up in Atlanta just a season earlier. The Jets greatly exceeded expectations and were just eight points out of the playoffs, and not mathematically eliminated until the final week. All of this information certainly supports NHL realignment to cities like Quebec City, who are certainly eager to do have what their counterparts in Winnipeg. But should the NHL go ahead with this "game" of shuffling franchises to cities with stronger fan bases?

In the early 1990s, the NHL took a chance by moving teams in dire financial straits to cities in the United States below the Mason-Dixon line. Raleigh, Atlanta, Phoenix, Dallas, Miami, Tampa Bay and Nashville all ended up with new or relocated NHL franchises, and the league hoped that they would help further the popularity of hockey in the South. Almost twenty years after this experiment began, the jury remains out as to whether or not this foray has worked. Dallas, Carolina and Tampa Bay have each won Stanley Cups in the past fifteen years, but in seasons where the teams aren't playing as well, ticket sales and attendance have plummeted. Gary Bettman, the commissioner of the NHL, has been around since the expansion/relocation movement began, and would not want to concede defeat by relocating teams to northern or Canadian locales. Still, many people see this whole process as a game, where one wrong step can result in a team being yanked from a city forever. Fans from Quebec have traveled to places like Phoenix and Long Island, New York at the first sign of a franchise's weakness, to show that their city is ready to support these struggling teams.

In a class where we have talked about how any industry, field or subject can be thought of as a game, it is interesting to see that in hockey, there is more than just the game that occurs on the ice. The entire National Hockey League is full of games within other games, and whether it is crowning another Stanley Cup champion (hopefully my New York Rangers) or pulling a team like the Phoenix Coyotes out of the desert and onto the frozen tundra of Quebec, every move made by the league is just another piece of the larger puzzle.


- Alex Jacobs

2 comments:

  1. Great post. As a former hockey player and fan myself, it is fascinating to think about the way the league works as an interconnected network, and how each team individually contributes to the success of the league. What you mentioned is true - it isn't just about the games that are played on the ice.

    I grew up in the suburbs of Detroit my whole life, and am ridiculously spoiled when it comes to being around a successful franchise. When you just assume that your team will make the playoffs year after year, you take it for granted. I had the opportunity to attend a Florida Panthers game last year and it was a completely different experience. It was quite apparent right off the bat that the core fan base did not exist, and the arena wasn't even close to being filled.

    Overall I don't see the harm is continued realignment. Put the hockey teams where there are people who care to see them. I think the sports popularity should grow organically, and if it hasn't caught on after 20 years or so, then I think it is acceptable to readress the situation.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I am not the biggest hockey fan, but over the past five years or so I have sparked an Interest. This of course is because of my Chicago Blackhawks and the success that they have been having. including a stanley cup championship in 2010. I think that it is great for the NHL that they are trying to create new locations in the country where there is gaining support for the League. Having new teams enter the league creates excitement and change that I think fans love to see. Going on the topic of playoff hockey, there is nothing better than watching NHL playoff games. It almost seems like a different season because eyou can see how seriously the players take it. They seem to play much harder and faster than in the regular season and the hitting during the playoffs gets extremely intense! I could honestly enjoy watching any playoff hockey game between any two teams and enjoy the game, especially when there are underdogs in the playoffs like the coyotes, or kings. So far the playoffs have been exciting to watch and I can't wait to see who comes out on top with the stanley cup in their hands.

    ReplyDelete